SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Del) 98

AVADH BEHARI ROHATGI
SALIM-UD-DIN – Appellant
Versus
SHARAFUDDIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.J.NAYAR, M.S.SAWHNEY

AVADH BEHARI ROHATGI, J. (ORAL)

( 1 ) THIS is a contempt petition under ss. II and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (the Act ). As far back as 1964, Sharafuddin and Shahabuddid made an application for ejectment of their tenant, Mohammed Din. from premises No. 7687, Ward No. XIV, Gali Takhat Wali Qasabpura, Delhi. The Additional Rent Controller passed an order of eviction on 18th August, 1967. The order of eviction was passed on the ground of bona fide requirement of the landlords. Mohammed Din did not file any appeal. So the order of eviction became final.

( 2 ) IN 1968 the tenant Mohammed Din died leaving behind a widow, three sons and two daughters. In January, 1975 the widow also died. On 27th February, 1976, one of the tenant s son and daughter, namely, Saleemuddin and Mst. Ameequan, filed objections under ss. 3 and 4 of the Dehli Rent Control (Amendment) Act, 1976. They claimed that they were covered by the definition of the term tenant and could not therefore be ejected in execution of the eviction order. On 26th March, 1976, the Additional Rent Controller dismissed their objections as not maintainable. As the decree of eviction was passed against Mohammed Din in his l




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top