SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Del) 92

T.P.S.CHAWLA
PRAMILLA KHOSLA – Appellant
Versus
RAJNISH KUMAR KHOSLA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.C.SINGHANIA, P.N.Gupta, SVARUP SINGH

T. P. S. CHAWLA

( 1 ) IN this case a wife has filed a petition under Sections 22 and 23 of the Indian Divorce Act 1869. She prays for a decree of Judicial separation on the ground of cruelty by the husband. The petition commences with the statement that the parties were married on 9th April, 1972 at New Delhi according to Arya Samaj Rites . In the second paragraph it is said that the petitioner professes the Christian religion while the respondent professes the Hindu religion . Thereafter, the matrimonial history is narrated with which I am not presently concerned.

( 2 ) AFTER being served with the petition, the first thing the husband did, even before filing his written statement, was to move an application under Order 7 rule 11 and section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908. This is the application which I have now to decide. The contention of the husband is that, on the face of it, the petition by the wife is not maintainable under the Indian Divorce Act as it admits that the marriage was performed according to Arya Samaj Rites, which is a Hindu form of marriage and postulates that both parties were Hindus. Therefore, according to the husband, the wife can seek relief, if

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top