H.L.ANAND, M.L.JAIN, V.S.DESHPANDE
HAJI MOHAMMED DIN – Appellant
Versus
NARAIN DASS – Respondent
( 1 ) IT is the effect of the change in the definition of "tenant" in section 2 (1) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (the principal Act) brought about by the retrospective amendment made by section 2 of the Delhi Rent Control (Amendment) Act, 1976 (amending Act), which is to be considered in these appeals referred to the Full Bench.
( 2 ) THE Questions (1) What is the meaning of "tenant" in section 2 (1) of the principal Act firstly under the old definition as it existed prior to 1st December, 1975 and secondly in the amended definition with effect from 1st December, 1975 ? (2) Does the decision of the Supreme Court in Damadilal and others v. Parashram and others, AIR 1976 S. C. 2229 (1), apply to the construction of the old definition of "tenant" in preference to the majority decision in Anand Nivas Pvt. Ltd. v. Anandji Kalyanji Pedhi and others, AIR 1965 SC 4 14 (2), followed in J. C. Chatterjee and others, v. Shri Sri Kishan Tandon and others, AIR 1972 S. C. 2526 (3) ? (3) Whether in the new definition clauses (ii) and (iii) of section 2 (1) have to be considered together or whether clause (ii) thereof can be construed independently of clause (iii) and without
REFERRED TO : Damadilal and others v. Parashram and others
An,and Nivas Pvt. Ltd. v. Anandji Kalyanji Pedhi and others
J.C.Chatterjee and others v. Shri Sri Kishan Tandon and others
Mohan Lal and others v. Shri Krishan and others
Ganpat Ladha v. Sashikant Uishnu Shinde
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.