SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Del) 181

H.L.ANAND, M.L.JAIN, V.S.DESHPANDE
HAJI MOHAMMED DIN – Appellant
Versus
NARAIN DASS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.Sehgal, M.Ahmed

V. S. DESHPANDE

( 1 ) IT is the effect of the change in the definition of "tenant" in section 2 (1) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (the principal Act) brought about by the retrospective amendment made by section 2 of the Delhi Rent Control (Amendment) Act, 1976 (amending Act), which is to be considered in these appeals referred to the Full Bench.

( 2 ) THE Questions (1) What is the meaning of "tenant" in section 2 (1) of the principal Act firstly under the old definition as it existed prior to 1st December, 1975 and secondly in the amended definition with effect from 1st December, 1975 ? (2) Does the decision of the Supreme Court in Damadilal and others v. Parashram and others, AIR 1976 S. C. 2229 (1), apply to the construction of the old definition of "tenant" in preference to the majority decision in Anand Nivas Pvt. Ltd. v. Anandji Kalyanji Pedhi and others, AIR 1965 SC 4 14 (2), followed in J. C. Chatterjee and others, v. Shri Sri Kishan Tandon and others, AIR 1972 S. C. 2526 (3) ? (3) Whether in the new definition clauses (ii) and (iii) of section 2 (1) have to be considered together or whether clause (ii) thereof can be construed independently of clause (iii) and without





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top