SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Del) 40

B.C.MISRA, PRAKASH NARAIN
RAJ PARKASH – Appellant
Versus
MANGAT RAM CHOWDHRY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MANJU MALHOTRA, MOHD.ANIS, MOHINDER NARAIN, S.C.SINGHA, S.S.JAUHAR

PRAKASH NARAIN, J.

( 1 ) THIS first appeal is directed against the judgment of a learned single Judge of this Court, who declded the suit between the partics on the Original Side of the High Court. The appeal, preferred TO against the judgment of the learned single Judge delivered on December 15. 1972. was admitted on February 28, 1973. That appeal came up for hearing before a Bench of this Court (Coram : S. N. Andley. C. J. and Prakash Narain. J. ). The Bench by its order of April 30, 1974 framed an additional issue and remanded the case back to the learned single Judge for a finding on the said issue and disposal of the suit thereafter. The second judg-ment in consequence of the remand order was delivered on January 27. 1975. The matter thereafter came up before us.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff/appellant produces and markets a toy called a viewer. This viewer uses a 35 mm. medially cut positive film on which are printed one or more pictures viewed through a lens fitted in a viewer specially adapted for use of such medially cm strips of 35 mm. positive films so as to get a virtual image of the same size as the virtual image of a normal frame in a 35 mm. film. The plaintiff obtained a paten















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top