( 1 ) THIS is tenant s second appeal against the judgment of the courts below allowing the eviction application filed by the respondent- landlady. The respondent landlady, moved an application under clause (e) of proviso to subsection (1) of Section 14 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter called the Act ). It was pleaded that the tenant was occupying two rooms, bath and kitchen of the house while she was occupying the garage attached to which there was no kitchen, bath or store. She was not keeping good health and was alone, also there was no no place where her only child, daughter who is married and her son-in-law along with her grand children could come and live with her, and that she bona fide required them to live with her. This was countered by the appellant tenant who pleaded that the need was not bona fide

( 2 ) EARLIER an application for eviction was filed on 9. 6. 1964 claiming the possession of the suit property on the same ground, namely that the premises were required bona fide by the respondent landlady. However an agreement was arrived at between the parties and by deed of 1. 8. 1964 Ex. R. 2 the appellant tenant agreed to pay the rent of Rs.