SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Del) 161

H.L.ANAND, V.S.DESHPANDE
PRABHU DAYAL LAXMI NARAIN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.S.Mac, M.L.BHARGAV

V. S. DESHPANDE

( 1 ) THIS reference to a larger Bench is made because two divergent constructions of section 77-C (1) of the Indian Railways Act, 1890 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seem to be possible. One construction results in making the Railway Administration liable for any damage, deterioration, leakage or wastage of goods carried by it, while the other construction exempts the Railway from such liability. We are to consider which of the two construction is to be preferred and why.

SUB-SECTIONS (1) and (4) of section 77-C of the Act, which alone are relevant, are reproduced below :

" (1) When any goods tendered to a railway administration to be carried by railway-

(A) are in a defective condition as a consequence of which they are liabl eto damage, deterioration, leakage or wastage, or

(B) are either defectively packed or packed in a manner not in accordance with the general or special order, if any issued under sub-section (4), and as a result of such defective or improper packing are liable to damage. deterioration, leakage or wastage, and the fact of such condition or defective or improper packing has been recorded by a sender or his agent in the forwarding note, then,























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top