B.C.MISRA
ONKAR SWAMP – Appellant
Versus
THAKUR BIKRAM SINGH – Respondent
( 1 ) PETITIONER and deft. 2 were partners in a firm. Petitioner sold his share to deft. 1 for Rs. 25,000. 00 and deft. 1 gave him cheque on 24-4-70 for part amount, of Rs. 15,000. 00 which was to be presented on re-validation of licenses. The cheque when presented was dishonoured. On 22-2-73, deft. 1 sued petitioner for injunction that he should not encash the cheque and petitioner received its summons for 20-7-73 and filed w/s on that day and 5-11-73 was fixed for replication and issues. Petitioner filed his suit for Rs. 33,750. 00 on 23-4-73 and 24-5-73 was fixed for service. Service did not take place as process fee was filed very late. For adjourned date 17-7-73, only deft. 2 was served and he was absent. For the next date 28-8-73, petitioner s counsel did not give process fee and suit against him was dismissed under O. 9, R. 3, CPC. For filing w/s of deft. 2. 12-9-73 was fixed upon costs of Rs. 100. 00. Deft. 2 instead of filing W/s or paying costs filed a review application. It was dismissed and the court passed decree under Order 8 Rule 10 against deft. 2. to the other case, the plaintiff instead of filing replication withdrew the suit, when the petitioner s law
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.