SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Del) 2

B.C.MISRA
SURAJ PARKASH VAID – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.BHATTACHARYA, D.N.NIJHAVAN

B C. Misra, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the order of the Sub-Judge 1st Class, dated 15th October, 1974, by which he has declined the request of the plaintiff to order the defendants to admit and/or deny the documents under Order 12 Rule 2 of the Code while the learned Judge has directed the plaintiff to produce their certified copies.

( 2 ) THE petitioner has instituted the suit giving rise to the revision against the Union of India, the Registrar of the Supreme Court and the Chief Justice of India for recovery of Rs. 6. 000. 00 as damages for wrongful reduction in rank in the employment of the petitioner in the Supreme Court. The petitioner was reduced in rank and then finally removed from service. Another suit was instituted by the petitioner attacking the aforesaid two orders. I am told that the court of first instance dismissed the said suit, but the lower appellate court held that the removal from service was valid, while the reduction in rank was legally infirm. I am also informed that feeling aggrieved by the said decree, the plaintiff petitioner has instituted a second appeal in th















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top