SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Del) 63

D.K.KAPUR
OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF R. C. ABROL AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) – Appellant
Versus
R. C. ABROL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.C.Khanna, S.Jain

D. K. KAPUR

( 1 ) THE Official Liquidator acting as Liquidator of M/s. R. C. Abrol and Co. (P) Ltd. , in liquidation, has instituted a criminal complaint under Sections 538 and 541 of the Companies Act, 1956, on account of the failure of the accused persons to hand over the books of account and records of the company and also, on account of their failure to keep proper books of account duripg the two years immediately preceding the winding up of the company. There are eight accused in the case of whom, Shri R. C. Abrol, accused No. 1 is stated to be the ex-Managing Director, accused Nos. 2 to 4 are stated to be directors and accused Nos. 5 to 8 are stated to be Accounts Officer, Sales Officer and Administrative Officers of the company. This Court had ordered summons to issue on this complaint on 19th September, 1972, and after that the complaint has taken a long time, because it was difficult to get the accused served.

( 2 ) ON 22nd September, 1975, I expressed some doubt as to whether this Court had Original Criminal jurisdiction to entertain the criminal complaint as it was not a Court of Original Criminal jurisdiction. Arguments have been addressed on this question and I now proc















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top