SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Del) 158

PRAKASH NARAIN
HIRA LAL – Appellant
Versus
AMARJIT SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Bala Krishna Narayana, K.L.RATHI, S.R.GUPTA, VIR SAIN SAWHNEY

Prakash Narain

( 1 ) RESPDT. 2 obtained an eviction order against petitioner on 4. 8. 66 which was executable after31. 12. 71. On 17. 4. 72, Respdt. 2 applied for permission U/s 19 of Slum Areas Act which was granted on 28. 1. 75. Tenant filed petition U/art. 227 to High Court questioning order of competent authority on grounds, amongst other, that tenant s affidavit had been wrongly rejected. Judgment after giving above facts. para 9 onwards is :-

( 2 ) BEFORE I close I would like to comment upon the question of affidavits once again, Social beneficial legislation has been undertaken by the State to fulfil the avowed purpose of creating a welfare State. It is for this reason that special Tribunals have been created and certain benefits and protections have been given to what may generally be called the weaker section of the society. In order, however, to mitigate the trouble and inconvenience caused by high cost of litigation or the time taken in normal litigation, summary procedures have been permitted in Tribunals. In furtherance of the concept of expenditions trial evidence is often taken in Tribunals on affidavits. These affidavits must, therefore, be proper affidavits confirmin




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top