SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Del) 176

YOGESHWAR DAYAL
CHAMAN LAL – Appellant
Versus
MOHAN LAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
HIRANANDAN, S.P.Mahajan

Yogeshwar Dayal

( 1 ) THIS order will dispose of civil revisions Nos. 375 and 376 of 1976 against the identical orders passed by the learned Subordinate Judge dated 21st October 1975. By these orders the trial court decided the application of Mohan Lal dated 10. 4. 1985 under section 151 read with Order 22 rule 3 and Order 1 rule 10 C. P,c,

( 2 ) IN these applications Mohan Lal, who was a defendant in a suit filed by Rajinder Kumar, his brother and Smt. Shakuntala Devi, his mother, had alleged that Rajinder Kumar, plaintiff, died on 10-9-1972 leaving behind Smt. Shakuntala Devi widow of Rajinder Kumar who was suspected to be the murderer of her husband but has since been acquitted of the charge of murder on 23. 4. 1974 and is in a position to represent her husband in the above mentioned suit. It is further alleged in the application that Chaman Lal, his brother had made an application that he should be substituted as plaintiff in the above mentioned case. It was also alleged that under the Hindu Succession Act he is not the lawful heir or successor to his brother Rajinder Kumar in the presence of the widow Smt. Shakuntala Devi. It was in these circumstances, prayed that Smt. Shakunta












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top