SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Del) 174

AVADH BEHARI ROHATGI
MOHAMMAD SWALLEHIN – Appellant
Versus
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MADAN BHATIA, MAEHSVAR DAYAL, V.P.NANDA

AVADH BEHARI ROHATGI

( 1 ) ON April 9, 1964, the respondent Union of India issued a notification under S. 4 of the Land Acquisition Act (the Act) in respect of the petitioners lands situated in Malikpur Chhawani, Delhi, admeasuring 194 bighas-19 biswas comprising field Nos. 351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358 and 359. On May 15, 1964, the petitioners filed objections under S. 5-A of the Act. Without hearing the petitioners on their objections the Government issued a notification under S. 5 on November 30, 1964.

( 2 ) AGGRIEVED by this action of the Government the petitioners brought a writ petition on January 30, 1968 (C. W. No. 123 of 1968 ). Their main complaint in that case was that no notification under S. 6 of the Act could be issued without hearing them on their objections as required by the mandatory provisions of S. 5-A of the Act. The Government realised its mistake. Accordingly, on December 9, 1968, the Government made an application to the court (CM 2522- J of 1968 ). This application was styled as one under s. 151, Code of Civil Procedure. In this application it was conceded that "no notice was issued to the petitioners for hearing of those objections and the mandat






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top