SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Del) 204

B.C.MISRA
FATEH SINGH – Appellant
Versus
HUKAM CHOND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.P.Gupta, V.D.Mahajan

B. C. Misra

( 1 ) THIS revision petition has been filed under sub-section 25-B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 59 of 1958 (as amended by Act No. 18 of 1976 hereinafter referred to as the Act) by the tenant Fateh Singh, and is directed against the order of Controller, dated 7th September, 1976, by which he has refused the application of the tenant for leave to contest the eviction petition.

( 2 ) THE material facts of the case are that the respondent landlord instituted a petition under section 14a of the Act against two tenants including the petitioner before me, on the ground that the respondent landlord had been allotted Government accommodation which had been cancelled and which had been vacated by him and so he is entitled to obtain vacant possession of the tenanted premises from the two tenants.

( 3 ) NOTICE of the petition was issued fortrial in a summary manner. Both the tenants filed applications for leave to contest the eviction petition. The applications were supported by affidavits. The Controller below by the impugned order has refused leave to both the tenants and finally ordered their eviction. The other tenant Anand Parkash Singal, has already surrendered possession an







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top