SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Del) 80

AVADH BEHARI ROHATGI
RATAN AND COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
P. NARAYANAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANUP SINGH, B.S.Narang, K.G.BANSAL, R.P.Bansal

AVADH BEHARI ROHATGI

( 1 ) THESE are two appeals against the orders of the Assistant Registrar.

( 2 ) THE undisputed facts are these. On 5th October, 1966 the appellants Messrs. Rattan and Co. filed an application bearing No. 238044-B to register the trade mark JAINSON in class 6 in respect of padlocks. The application was advertised in the Trade Marks Journal on 1st September, 1967.

( 3 ) ON 30th November, 1967 the opponents Messrs. R. P. Locks Co. of Delhi filed an application in Form TM-44 praying for extension of time for one month for giving notice of opposition to the registration of the trade mark. This request was signed by their advocate engaged by them.

( 4 ) SINCE the request was not accompanied by a power of attorney of the said advocate no action was taken in the Registry on this request contained in TM-44.

( 5 ) ON 2nd December, 1967 a letter was addressed by the opponents advocate requesting the registry to treat TM-44 as withdrawn.

( 6 ) ON llth December, 1967 a notice of opposition signed by the said advocate along with a power of attorney was received in the Registry. The Registry by letter dated 18th December, 1967 informed the advocate that the notice of opposit




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top