SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Del) 111

PRITHVI RAJ
RAM NARAIN KHER – Appellant
Versus
AMBASSADOR INDUSTRIES NEW DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.K.ANAND, R.K.MAKHIJA

PRITHVI RAJ

( 1 ) THE plaintiff claiming to be the registered proprietor and grantee of Indian Patent No. 113388 dated 29th November, 1967 pertaining to air cooler by this application under Order 39. Rules 1 and 2 and Section 151, Civil Procedure Code seeks an ad interim injunction restraining the defendants, their servants, agents and representatives from adopting the method and process for manufacturing, selling or offering, far sale air coolers in infringement of the plaintiff s aforesaid patent with further relief for rendition at accounts.

( 2 ) THE case of the plaintiff is that he has legal right to the aforementioned patent for the period ending 29th November, 1983. and to refrain others from exploiting the said patent rights without permisson from him. According to the plaintiff the air cooler of the subject patent has distinct. advantages over the air cooler presently known in the art and that the coolers of the subject patent have acquired status and reputation. The grievance of the plaintiff is that in January, 1974, he came to hnow that the defendants have infringed and further intend to infrinffe the aforesaid patent by wrongfully adopting the plaintiffs process and met




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top