SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Del) 155

B.C.MISRA
MANOHAR LAL – Appellant
Versus
MOOL CHAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.Kumar, S.N.Mehta

B. C. Misra,j.

( 1 ) THE second appeal under S. 39 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 59 of 1958 (hereinafter REFERRED TO as the Act ) has been filed by the tenant against the appellate order of the Rent Control Tribunal, dated 9th January, 1975, by which it has, after condoning the delay in filing the appeal, dismissed it on merits, thereby affirming the order of the Additional Controller, dated 13th September, 1973 finally ordering eviction of the appellant from the premises in dispute on the ground of bona fide personal necessity.

( 2 ). The dispute between the parties relates to one room in B 34, Inder puri. New Delhi, which was let out by the respondent landlord to the appellant on a rent of Rs. 25. 00 per month The respondent instituted a petition for eviction on the grounds mentioned in clauses (a) (c) and (e) of the provision to sub-section (1) of the section 14 of the Act, but the other grounds of eviction did not survive and eviction has been ordered only on the ground of personal bona fide necessity mentioned in clause (e) of the proviso. The eviction petition was contested by the appellant. The Additional Controller and the Tribunal have both come to the conclusion that re








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top