V.S.DESHPANDE, YOGESHWAR DAYAL
KUMKUM KHANNA – Appellant
Versus
MOTHER ACQUINAS – Respondent
( 52 ) HER absence was due to her father's death and her mother's illness. This reason is not covered by Ordinance VII. The only possible relief she could get was from the Vice-Chancellor and the Academic Council under Ordinance XA. Unfortunately, her representation under Ordinance XA has been rejected.
REFERRED TO : Praga Tools Corporation v. C. V. Imanual
Sirai Municipality v. Cecelia Kom Francis Tellis
Shri Vidya Ram Misra v. Managing Committee Shri Jai Narain College
S. R. Tewari v. District Board, Agra
Vaish College (Society) Sharnli v. Sri Lakshmi Narain
Harijander Singh v. Selection Committee, Kakative Medical College
Union of India v. Col. J. N. Sinha
Board of H. S. and Intermediate Education v. Bagleshwar Prasad
The Board of High School and Intermediate Education v. Chittra Srivastava
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.