SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Del) 40

S.N.SHANKAR
MOHINDER PAL – Appellant
Versus
RAM RALI DEVI – Respondent


S. N. Shankar

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the order of the Rent Control Tribunal holding that the appellant had defaulted in making deposits in accordance with the order under Section 15 (1) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter called "the Act") passed by the learned Additional Rent Controller. The fresh ground urged in this appeal, for the first time, is that this order under Section 15 (1) was illegal and without jurisdiction.

( 2 ) THE relevant facts are that the respondent filed an application for eviction of the appellant, amongst others, on the ground that he was in arrears of rent which he had not paid in spite of a duly served notice of demand and eviction In the reply filed by the appellant, the subsistence ot relationship of landlord and tenant as well as the rate of rent for the premises was admitted. The due service of the notice of demand and eviction was also not denied. On August 28, 1971, the learned Additional Rent Controller passed an order under Section 15 (1) of the Act requiring the appellant to deposit rent with effect from August 3, 1969 to August 28, 1971 at the rate of Rs. 70. 00 per month. The tenant made some deposits but failed to deposit












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top