T.V.R.TATACHARI, V.S.DESHPANDE
KRISHNA PARKASH – Appellant
Versus
SHANTA SINHA CHENOY – Respondent
( 1 ) WHAT are the rights and remedies of an owner of immovable property against an unauthorised occupant and his licensee in respect of the property ? This question arises for consideration in this appeal on the following facts.
( 2 ) MRS. Chenoy, Respondent No. 1 is the owner of the premises at 20, Sunder Nagar, the ground floor of which was let out to Dr. Suraj Prakash at Rs. 1000 per month who was alleged to have had consulting medical practice on the premises.
( 3 ) WHILE a suit by the landlady against Dr. Suraj Prakash for eviction was pending before the Rent Controller, Dr. Suraj Prakash died. The Appellants were brought on record as his legal representatives, but the Rent Controller held that the proceedings for eviction before him abated on the death of the tenant inasmuch as the tenancy had been terminated by a notice to quit before the eviction proceedings were filed. Dr. Suraj Prakash had become only a statutory tenant. Therefore, the protection of the Delhi Rent Control Act to him came to an end with his death. As his legal representatives did not inherit either the tenancy or the statutory protection from Dr. Suraj Prakash and as the Rent Controlle
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.