SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Del) 134

YOGESHWAR DAYAL
JAGDISH CHANDER – Appellant
Versus
BAKSHI CHATARPAL SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Goja Nand, GURCHARAN SINGH, J.P.Gupta

Yogeshwar Dayal, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition for revision against the order of the trial court dated 13th October, 1 972, whereby the trial court suo motu allowed an amendment in a reply filed by the plainuffs-decree-holders to the application filed by the petitioners under Order 9 Ruls 13 Civil Procedure Code for setting aside the decree passed against them and to raise a new plea subsequently.

( 2 ) THE decree dated 25th November, 1966 was pasted against the petitioners and respondents 2 to 10 for money where the present petitioners were judgment-debtors Nos. 7 and 9. On the petitioners coming to know the decree they filed an applicat on under Order 9 Rule 13 read with section 151 of the Code of Civil Proeedure for setting aside the decree passed on 25th November. 1966.

( 3 ) IT was alleged in the application that the pstitioners had come to know of the decree on or about 9th December, 1968 It was pleaded that they were not served at all in the suit and had no knowledge of any kind whatsoever about the proceedings of the sdit It was submitted that in spite of non-service exparte proceedings were taken against them and exparte decree was passed which was liable to be set aside. Th












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top