YOGESHWAR DAYAL
JAGDISH CHANDER – Appellant
Versus
BAKSHI CHATARPAL SINGH – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a petition for revision against the order of the trial court dated 13th October, 1 972, whereby the trial court suo motu allowed an amendment in a reply filed by the plainuffs-decree-holders to the application filed by the petitioners under Order 9 Ruls 13 Civil Procedure Code for setting aside the decree passed against them and to raise a new plea subsequently.
( 2 ) THE decree dated 25th November, 1966 was pasted against the petitioners and respondents 2 to 10 for money where the present petitioners were judgment-debtors Nos. 7 and 9. On the petitioners coming to know the decree they filed an applicat on under Order 9 Rule 13 read with section 151 of the Code of Civil Proeedure for setting aside the decree passed on 25th November. 1966.
( 3 ) IT was alleged in the application that the pstitioners had come to know of the decree on or about 9th December, 1968 It was pleaded that they were not served at all in the suit and had no knowledge of any kind whatsoever about the proceedings of the sdit It was submitted that in spite of non-service exparte proceedings were taken against them and exparte decree was passed which was liable to be set aside. Th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.