SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Del) 125

PRAKASH NARAIN, R.N.AGGARWAL
AIR FOAM INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.B.SAHARIA, D.C.SINGHANIA, K.B.Soni, M.K.Garg, VED VYAS

Prakash Narain

( 1 ) BY this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioners pray for the issue of an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus and/or otherwise directing the respondents to Pay Rs. 2,31,663. 00 due to the petitioners and an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus and/or otherwise directing the respondents to act in accordance with the order dated May 19,1972 passed by Hen ble Mr. Justice T. P. S. Chawla in 1. A. No. 846 of 1972 in Suit No. 158 of 1971 and made absolute by Hon ble Mr. Justice Avadh Behari byjudgment and order dated November 15, 1972.

( 2 ). Petitioner No. 1 is aprivate limited company within the meaning of the Companies Act, 1956 with its registered office at 27, Khan Market flats, New Delhi. Petitioner No. 2 is an engineer who describes himself in the petition as a " self-employed whole time Technical Director "of petitioner No. 1. The first respondent is the Union of India, the second respondent is the Director-General of Supplies and Disposals, Government of India and the third respondent is Shri J. C. Bhandari, Director of Supplies (Vehicle Directorate), Directorate General of Su


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top