( 1 ) IN this case, the only question that has arisen for consideration is whether the landlord after obtaining an order of eviction against his tenant, who dies subsequent to the passing of the said order against him, cannot have it executed against his legal representatives

( 2 ) ON behalf of the legal representatives of the deceased, who are the appellants before me, it is contended that they are not the tenants and, therefore, the Additional Controller had no jurisdiction to execute the eviction order against them, as the Act, according to them, is confined to disputes between landlords and tenants alone.

( 3 ) THE contention of the appellants is unfounded. Under sectior 32 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, herein called the Act the controller has been given specific jurisdiction, notwithstanding anything contained in any other law, to execute such an order against all persons, who may be in occuption of the premises and o evict them therefrom. The executing arm of the Controller has no been restricted upto the tenant or the ex-tenant. Apart from this, undei ection 37 of the Act, the Controller is required to follow, as far as may be, the practice and procedure o