SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Del) 20

M.R.A.ANSARI, S.RANGARAJAN
STATE – Appellant
Versus
PREM SARUP PURL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.MARVAHA, R.L.MEHTA, S.C.SINGHA

S. RANGARAJAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS judgment will not only dispose of Cr. Rev. 224 of 1972 but also Cr. Writ 20 of 1972 both preferred TO by Prem Sarup Puri; Cr, Revision 265 of 1972 has been preferred TO by the State.

( 2 ) THE Hon ble the Chief Justice has constituted this Bench for hearing the above on a reference made by one of us (Ansari. J. ).

( 3 ) THE facts alleged by the prosecution may be briefly stated. One Ravi batra of Simla had applied in response to an advertisement in the Hindustan Times in the winter months of 1966. for the post of an Executive. in an eminent international organisation, care of a certain Post Box Number: he was called for an interview and interviewed by Prem Sarup Puri (hereinafter called puri ) at his residence in Defence Colony, New Delhi, some time in February. 1967. Puri advised Ravi Batra to apply for a passport as the post would entail travel abroad. Ravi Batra accordingly applied to the Regional Passport Officer. New Delhi and also addressed a letter authorising P. R. Mehra of Messrs Sita World Travels, New Delhi to collect his passport from the office of the Regional Passport Officer. At the suggestion of Puri Ravi Batra further wrote to P. R. Me



































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top