SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Del) 72

S.K.KAPUR, PRAKASH NARAIN, M.R.A.ANSARI
STATE – Appellant
Versus
MASTER TAMEEJ – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.C.MATHUR, R.L.TANDON, SATISH SONI

PRAKASH NARAIN, J

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by the State (Delhi Administration) against the order of acquittal passed by the trial Magistrate in favour of the respondent who was prosecuted under section 14 of the Foreigners Act, 1946. The charge was that he being a. national of Pakistan was found overstaying in India without any permission or valid passport. Originally, the appeal came up for hearing before my brothers M. R. A. Ansari and D. K. Kapur, JJ. By their order dated January 25 ,1973, they made a refrence to a larger bench. That is how the matter has been placed before the three of us.

( 2 ) THE relevant facts in. this case are not in dispute. Briefly stated, the facts are as follows: The respondent Maser Tameej. is the son. of one Mohd, Ismail and was born at Delhi in the year 1943. Both his parents are Indian citizens. Sometime in 1947 the respondent was taken by his maternal grand parents to Pakistan along with the elder brother, Bundu. On May 23, 1953, a joint passport was obtained by the respondent s said grand-parents, Mr. and Mrs. Faehmuddin for themselves and the two boys. A visa was granted to the four of them by the Indian High Commission at Lahore for visiting Indi


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top