SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Del) 155

S.RANGARAJAN
CHAMAN LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.G.SINGH, K.K.Luthra, K.K.Sud, P.P.MALHOTRA

Rangarajan, J.

( 1 ) THE facts leading to the revision petition brieffy are as follows :- Before Shri K. K. Chowdhury, Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Delhi, Madan Lal gave a complaint against Chanan Lal and Ved Parkash (Petitioners) on 14-9-71 alleging the commission of offences punishable under Section 323/504 Indian Penal Code. The police had already filed a challan in May, 1971, against yet another Chanan Lal, nephew of Mohan Lal (complainant ). There was also a private complaint filed by Sohan Lal, uncle of Chanan Lal (Petitioner) against Mohan Lal (complainant) and two others under Section 323 I. P. C. All these complaints are said to relate to the same occurrence, which happened on 28th of March, 1971.

( 2 ) SHRI B. N. Chaturvedi took cognizance of the complaint and examined the complainant besides four others witnesses under Section 202 Cr. P. C. The last of them was examined on 15-2-72. Subsequently it was posted on various dates for arguments and for orders; it was finally posted by Shri B. N. Chaturvedi to 11 -5-78. Shri B. N. Chaturvedi had not directed the issue of process. On 11-5-1972 the successor Magistrate (Shri M. S. Rohilla) directed the issue of process to the a














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top