SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Del) 201

AVADH BEHARI ROHATGI
V. RAJARAMAN – Appellant
Versus
HINDVSTAN BROWN BOVERI LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANUP SINGH, N.S.Rao, R.K.KAPOOR, S.C.Malik Sayeed Uddin

AVADH BEHARI, J. (Oral)

( 1 ) V. Rajaraman, Liquidator of Globe United Engineering and Foundry Company Ltd. has instituted this suit for the recovery of Rs. 5,00,000 against the defendant M/s. Hindustan Brown Boveri Ltd. The defendant filed his written statement and then subsequently amended it. The defendant has raised a number of preliminary objections.

( 2 ) FIRSTLY, it is alleged that this Court has no jurisdication to entertain and try this suit since no part of the cause of action has arisen within the jurisdiction of the court and the defendant s registered office is situated in Bombay. The second objection is that the suit as framed and filed in the name of V. Rajaraman is not competent. Thirdly, it is alleged that no leave of the Court was obtained prior to the filing of the suit against the defendants.

( 3 ) IN the replication, the plaintiff submitted that no prior sanction was required for the institution of the suit by the plaintiff and went on to say that if any sanction is required the same can be granted even after the institution of the suit. On the pleadings of the parties, the following issue was framed on August 27, 1971

1. "whether this Court has territorial juris
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top