SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Del) 231

S.N.ANDLEY
MANJARI SEN – Appellant
Versus
NIRUPAM SEN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHOK GROVER, BASUDEV PRASAD, S.L.Bhatia

S. N. ANDLEY, C. J.

( 1 ) BY this petition under sub-section (3) of section 23 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the petitioner prays that the petition (Hindu Marriage Act Case No. 184 of 1973) filed by the respondent and pending in the Court of the District Judge, Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this High Court be transferred to the Court of the District Judge, Patna, within the jurisdiction of the Patna High Court. The respondent is the husband and the petitioner is his wife. The aforesaid petition has been filed by the respondent under section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for a decree of judicial separation primarily on the ground of mental cruelty.

( 2 ) THE parties were married at Patna on February 4, 1971. After the marriage the petitioner lived with the respondent at Delhi for about twenty days when she went back to Patna but returned to Delhi in or about May, 1971 and stayed here upto about July, 1971. She again went back to Patna in July, 1971 to join her college and she remained there till about March, 1972. Then she came back to Delhi where the parties stayed together till about the middle of July, 1972 when they left for Moscow where the respondent was posted. But
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top