SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Del) 279

JAGJIT SINGH, R.N.AGGARWAL
ABDUL HAQ – Appellant
Versus
HAFIZ ABDUL RASHID – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
SVATANTAR KUMAR, V.M.ISSAR, Vijay Kishan

Jagjit Singh, J.

( 1 ) DURING hearing of petition U/art. 227 of the Constitution following question was referred to a D. B. by Single Judge :-

"whether the income or earning capacity of tenant alone should be taken into consideration by competent authority in proceedings U/s 19 of Slum Areas (Iandc) Act, 1956 or whether income of persons living with the tenant as members of his family can also be taken into consideration.

( 2 ) COMPETENT Authority granted permission to execute order of eviction obtained before the coming into force of the Act. (In para 3, Section 19 is reproduced.)

( 4 ) THUS in granting or refusing to grant the permission under Sub Section (3) one of the factors to be taken into account by the Competent Authority is whether alternative accommodation within the means of the tenant would be available to him if he were evicted.

( 5 ) IT appears that the interpretation of the expression "the means" as appearing in clause (a) of Sub section (4) of Section 19, has not been uniform. In Krishan Lal Vs. Smt. Ramo Devi and another (1972 R. L. R. (N) 162-D L. T 509, Safeer. , J. , quashed an order of the competent Authority by holding that it had been in disregard of the requi






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top