SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Del) 13

HARDAYAL HARDY, PRAKASH NARAIN
COLLECTOR – Appellant
Versus
SATWANT KAUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANIL RAZDAN, B.KISHORE, B.N.KIRPAL, J.P.Gupta

Hardayal Hardy

( 1 ) THIS apeal under clause 10 of the Letters Patent is directed against, a judgment of a learned Single Judge in Civil Writ No. 288 of 1968 -delivered on 1st September, 1969 whereby the petition was accepted and the respondents were directed to de-requisition the premises and restore the posses- sion thereof to its owner. The appellants are the collector of Delhi and Delhi Administration while the respondent is Smt. Savant Kaur, resident of 49/s3, Western Extension Area, Karol Bagh, New Delhi.

( 2 ). The petition relates to house No. 49, Blok No. 53 Western Extension Area, Karol Bagh, New Delhi of which the respondent claims to be the owner. The property originally belonged to one Mr Chopra and was requisitioned by an order of the Collector Delhi under Section 3 (4) of the Delhi Premises (Requisition and Eviction) Act, 1947 which will hereafter be REFERRED TO as the old Act with effect from 26th March. 1949 in response to an application filed by the Central Relief Committee of the All India Congress Committee for providing accommodation to the workers of the said relief Committee who were engaged in the relief and rehabilitation work in the State of Delhi.

( 3 ). O

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top