SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Del) 15

T.V.R.TATACHARI
BHAGWANTI – Appellant
Versus
HAVELI RAM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.C.CHATVAL, Maharaj Krishan Chawla

T. V. R. Tatachari

( 1 ) THIS second appeal has been filed by the tenants, Shrimati Bhagwanti and Arjan Dass. against an order of Shri Mohan Lal Jain, Rent Control Tribunal, Delhi, dated 6th June, 1968, in Rent Control Appeal No. 475 of 1958, dismissing the said appeal as not being maintainable for the reason that the order of Shri A P. Chowdhary, Additional Controller, Delhi, dated 3rd May 1968, appealed from, was only procedural and interlocutory in nature and, as such was not appealable under section 38 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.

( 2 ) HAVELI Ram, claiming to be the landlord in respect of Quarter No. 13-14, Block No. 20, Moti Nagar New Delhi, filed a petition, dated 27th December 1965, on 3rd January, 1966, before Shri A. P. Chowdhary, Additional Controller, Delhi, for eviction of three alleged tenants in respect of the said premises, viz. (1) Shrimati Bhagwanti, (2) Sunder Dass son of Durga Dass and (3) Arjan Dass, under clauses (3) and (h) of the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 14 of the Delhi Rent Contro1 Act, 1958. In column 18 (b) of the application, the heading of which was "whether notice required has been given and if so, particulars there of (copies of su













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top