( 1 ) FIVE questions arise for consideration in this Letters Patnent Appeal from the judgment of the learned single Judge of this Court:

(1) What are the limits of interference by the High Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution with the award of a Labour Court or an Industrial Tribunal? (2) What are the limits of interference by a Labour Court or an Industrial Tribunal with the findings arrived at in a domestic enquiry-whether it is confined to cases where there is no evidence and whether even a tittle is enough if it is not reasonably sufficient to support the finding? (3) Whether hearsay can be relied upon in domestic enquiries falling within the ambit of the Industrial Disputes Act? (4) When and how can a fresh, enquiry be made by the Industrial Tribunal or Labour Court while adjudicating an industrial dispute, REFERRED TO to it, concerning the termination of the services of a worker? (5) What are the considerations which may be taken into account for granting compensation alone but not reinstating the worker when the charge brought against him is not proved?

( 2 ) THE Municipal Corporation of Delhi is the appellant whose petition under Articles 226