SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Del) 209

RAJINDAR SACHAR
DEVI DAYAL – Appellant
Versus
BHUPINDER KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BALMUKAND GUPTA, P.L.SUD

RAJINDAR SACHAR

( 1 ) THIS suit was filed by Devi Dayal (who has since been substituted by his legal representatives) for the recovery of Rs. 2,50,000. 00. It was alleged in the suit that one Ch. Ram Narain Bishnoi took from the plaintiff different loans totalling Rupees 1,43,000. 00 and executed pronotes in favour of the plaintiff on the said dates. It was also stated in para 4 of the plaint that about a year back Ch. Ram Narain died and the defendants are his sons and legal representatives of his estate and are bound to pay the just debts of their father. A decree for Rupees 2,50,000. 00 comprising of Rs. 1,43,000. 00 as principal and Rs. 1,07,000. 00 as interest was therefore prayed. Suit was filed on 18-1-1965. In the suit when the evidence was being taken on commission on 6-2-1971 the advocate for the defendants made a statement that Banwari Lal, defendant No. 2 had died by failure of heart on 31-1-1971. On this the advocate for the plaintiff stated that the case could not proceed in the absence of the deceased defendant and the case was, therefore, adjourned for further proceedings. On this the Commissioner adjourned the matter and returned the proceedings to the court for fur















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top