SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Del) 230

P.N.KHANNA
SUNIL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
ROSHAN LAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.P.MALHOTRA, R.L.TANDON

( 1 ) THIS judgment will dispose of two cross-appeals, FAO 24-D of 1966, and FAO 80 D of 1966, directed against judgment of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, which have arisen in the following circumstances :

( 2 ) ON August 14, 1964, Sunil Kumar, herein referred to as the appellant , who at that time was six years of age, was involved in an accident with a DTU bus, bearing registration No. DLP 251, owned by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi, respondent No. 2, and Delhi Transport Undertaking (now Delhi Transport Corporation), herein referred to as respondent No. 3 which at the time of the accident was driven by the driver, respondent No. 1. The accident took place at about 11. 45 a. m. on the East Park Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi, as a result of which the appellant received severe injuries and was rushed to Willingdon Hospital, New Delhi, where his right leg above the knee had to be amputated. The appellant filed his claim through his next friend, his father, M. L. Dhingra, for a sum of Rs. 60,000. 00 as compensation on account of injuries received on his person. The accident was said to be the result of rash and negligent driving on the part of respondent No. 1, the driver.












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top