SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Del) 280

D.K.KAPUR, M.R.A.ANSARI
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,DELHI,NEW DELHI – Appellant
Versus
RAM SWARUP GUPTA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.Kirpal

D. K. KAPUR, J.

( 1 ) IN the calendar year 1957, Ram Swarup Gupta was carrying on business both as an individual and as a partner in an unregistered firm known as M/s. Rashtarya Grab Udyog. According to him, this firm was owned by him till 1st September, 1957, when it became a partnership. He had sufferred a loss up to 31st August, 1957 in this business to the extent of Rs. 13. 041. 00. In his assessment for the year 1958-59, he claimed that this loss of Rs. 13,041. 00 which was incurred by him before 1st September, 1957, should be deducted from his other business income. The Income Tax Officer disallowed this amount on the ground that the partnership had taken over the assets and liabilities of the business on 1st September, 1957, and the loss was not sufferred by the assessee as a proprietor of the firm.

( 2 ) ON appeal to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, it was held that the assessee had not been able to show that the firm came into existence on 1st September, 1957, or that he was the proprietor of the business before that date. It was observed in the order that the firm and the assessee were separate for the purposes of assessment of the loss of the firm, which besides bei
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top