SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Del) 295

M.R.A.ANSARI, D.K.KAPUR
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – Appellant
Versus
MAYA RANI PUNJ – Respondent


M. R. A. ANSARI, J.

( 1 ) THE following question has been REFERRED TO to this Court by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter REFERRED TO to as the Tribunal) under section 256 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter REFERRED TO to as the new Act):

"whether en the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was in law competent to reduce the penalty levied undersection 271 (1) (a) to a figure lower than the sum equal to 2/g of the tax for every month during which the default continued but not exceeding the aggregate 50^ of the tax?"

( 2 ) THE relevant facts may be briefly stated. The income tax return of the respondent herein, who will be REFERRED TO to hereinafter as the assessee, for the assessment year 1961-62 was due to be filed on or before z8-9-1961. The assessee did not file the return by that date nor did she apply for extension of time for filing the return. The return was filed en 3-5-1962, i. e. , after a delay of about 7 months. When the Income-tax Officer proposed to levy a penalty for the late filing of the return, the assessee pleaded that her husband was ill and that she had to leave the station for a long period. She also stated that she was




























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top