M.R.A.ANSARI, D.K.KAPUR
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – Appellant
Versus
MAYA RANI PUNJ – Respondent
( 1 ) THE following question has been REFERRED TO to this Court by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter REFERRED TO to as the Tribunal) under section 256 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter REFERRED TO to as the new Act):
"whether en the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was in law competent to reduce the penalty levied undersection 271 (1) (a) to a figure lower than the sum equal to 2/g of the tax for every month during which the default continued but not exceeding the aggregate 50^ of the tax?"
( 2 ) THE relevant facts may be briefly stated. The income tax return of the respondent herein, who will be REFERRED TO to hereinafter as the assessee, for the assessment year 1961-62 was due to be filed on or before z8-9-1961. The assessee did not file the return by that date nor did she apply for extension of time for filing the return. The return was filed en 3-5-1962, i. e. , after a delay of about 7 months. When the Income-tax Officer proposed to levy a penalty for the late filing of the return, the assessee pleaded that her husband was ill and that she had to leave the station for a long period. She also stated that she was
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.