SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Del) 26

V.D.MISRA, H.R.KHANNA, RAJINDAR SACHAR
MANAGEMENT OF DELHI TRANSPORT UNDERTAKING – Appellant
Versus
B B L HAJELEY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.N.Vohra, R.L.Roshan, S.N.CHOPRA

Rajindar Sachar, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a writ petition filed by the management of the Delhi Transport Undertaking (hereinafter called the undertaking ) against the order of the Labour Court, Delhi, dated February 8, 1969, by which it rejected the application filed by the petitioner under Section 33 (2) (b) of the Industrial Disputes Act for approving the removal of the respondent No. 2 from the service.

( 2 ) RESPONDENT No. 2 was originally employed as a driver under the Delhi Road Transport Authority (hereinafter called the Transport Authority) which had been constituted under the Delhi Road Transport Authority Act, 1950. Respondent No. 2 later on became an B employee under the Undertaking of the Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereinafter called the Corporation) by virtue of the Second Schedule to the Delhi Municipal Corporation act, 1957, (hereinafter called the Corporation Act) read with Sections 511, 516, 53 and 64, An enquiry was started against respondent No. 2 and he was served with a charge sheet on 7-8-1962. After holding an enquiry a show cause notice was issued to respondent No. 2 by the Assistant General Manager on 8-1-1963. Cause was shown by respondent No. 2, but the Assist






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top