SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Del) 3

D.K.KAPUR
KISHAN LAL – Appellant
Versus
NATHI LAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.L.Arora, SABIR HUSSAIN SAIF

D. K. KAPUR, J. (Oral)

( 1 ) THIS is a revision petition at the instance of the legal representatives of one Nanhay Ram deceased. The said Nanhay Ram had instituted a suit against the respondent Nathi Lal for recovery of an amount due on a mortage. A decree was passed in that suit on 21st July, 1964. According to both the parties before me this was a preliminary decree, though a copy of the decree that I have been shown, does not appear to be a preliminary decree in the form contemplated by Order 34, rules 4 and 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure. I am assuming, however, for the purpose of this order that the decree is a preliminary decree. After the said decree had been passed, Nanhay Ram died on 22nd September 1964 before the time for payment of the money, which was fied by the decree as 21st April 1965, had elapsed. Thereafter, an application was made by the present petitioners to be impleaded in the suit under Order 22, rule 3 of the Code. This application was contested by the respondent, who was defendant in the suit, on the ground that Order 22 rule 3 did not apply. The application for bringing the legal representatives on record in place of the deceased was dismissed for defaul





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top