SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Del) 21

V.S.DESHPANDE
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI – Appellant
Versus
HIRALAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.C.Vats, S.S.Chadha

V. S. Deshpande, J. (Oral)

( 1 ) WHO has the power to remove encroachment on a public street in Delhi, the Delhi Municipal Corporation acting under the provisions of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 (hereinafter called the Corporation Act) or the Gaon Panchayat acting under the Delhi Panchayat Raj Act, 1954 (hereinafter called the Panchayat Raj Act)? The Delhi Municipal Corporation. (appellant herein) sent a notice dated 20. 8. 1960 to Shri Hira Lal (respondent herein) asking the latter to remove encroachment from a public street in village Kapas Hora. The notice purported to be under sections 320 and 321 of the Corporation Act. Shri Hira Lal thereon instituted a suit praying that the Corporation be restrained from proceeding against him. The plaintiff, inter alia, alleged that the Corporation had no jurisdiction to serve the said notice on him inasmuch as the village was governed by the provisions of section 18 (1) of the Panchayat Raj Act. The suit was defended by the Corporation, inter alia, on the ground that the Corporation had the power to remove the encroachment made by the plaintiff on the public street under sections 320 and 321 of the Corporation Act.

( 2 ) THE su











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top