( 1 ) THIS is landlord s second appeal under section 39of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 against the order of the Rent Control Tribunal up-holding the order of the Additional Rent Controllerdismissing the application for eviction of the tenant.

( 2 ) ONE Kalsum Bi was the owner of the premises bearing municipalnos. 1817 to 1821. M/s. Bhagwan Dass Faqir Chand (hereinaftercalled the Tenant ) became a tenant under Mst. Kalsum Bi about25/30 years ago. Portions of the property were sublet from time totime to various persons. A part of the property was sublet to M/s. Delhi Vanaspati Syndicate (hereinatfer called the landlord ). Theentire building was purchased by the landlord in 1958 from Mst. Kalsum Bi through her attorney Habib ul Rehman. Thereafter, anapplication for eviction of the tenant under clauses (b) and (g) of theproviso to sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the Delhi Rent Control Act,1958 (hereinafter REFERRED TO to as Act of 1958) was made on thegrounds that the tenant had sublet the premises without obtaining theconsent of the land-lord in writing and that the landlord required thebuilding bona fide for the purposes of reconstruction. It was allegedthat sh