SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Del) 48

V.S.DESHPANDE
RAJ KRISHAN JAIN – Appellant
Versus
MASTER HOSHIAR SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
F.C.Bedi, GURCHARAN SINGH, JAGLESHVAR SINGH

V. S. Deshpande

( 1 ) THE premises belong- ing to the appellant-landlord were originally let out to the respondent- tenant at Rs 9450 per month The tenant was in arrears of rent and the landlord gave the first notice of demand under proviso (a) to subsection (1) of Section 14 of the Delhi Rent Control Act 1958 and then filed a petition for eviction of the tenanc on the ground that the arrears were not paid by the tenant within two months after the notice of demand. After the petition was filed, the Rent Controller made an order under Section 15 (1) of the said Act The tenant paid the arrears and, therefore, this first petition filed by the landlord for the eviction of the tenant was dismissed.

( 2 ). Subsequently a portion of the premises was demolished and, therefore, for two months, the tenant paid the rent of Rs. 84-50 per month oniy to the landlord. The reconstruction of the demolished portion enlarged the built up area of the premises and the tenant again started paying rent of Rs. 94-50 per month to the landlord. The tenant was again in arrears and, therefore, the landlord gave the following notice (Exhibit A. W. 5/6) on 9th October, 1964 :-

"under instructions from Shri Krishe






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top