HARDAYAL HARDY, M.R.A.ANSARI
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – Appellant
Versus
P. N. BEHL – Respondent
( 1 ) IN this reference under section 66 (1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 (hereinafter REFERRED TO to as the act ) the following two questions of law have been REFERRED TO to this court by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (Delhi Bench a New Delhi) :
(1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the expenditure of Rs. 5,282. 00 incurred by the assessee in connection with his foreign tour was a revenue expenditure entitled to deduction in computing his professional income ? (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case. the Tribunal was right in holding that the sum of Rs. 3. 000. 00 received by the assessee was receipt of a casual and non-recourring nature exempt from tax u/s. 4 (3) (vii) of the Indian Income-tax Act 1922?the respondent, who will herein-after be REFERRED TO to as asscssee is a medical practitioner and is a specalist in the treatment of skin diseases. The assessment year is 1958-59, the relevant previous year being the financial year, ending on 31st March, 1958.
( 2 ) DURING the previous year, the assessee went from New Delhi to. Stockholm to attend the International Congress of Dermatology as an officia
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.