SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Del) 66

HARDAYAL HARDY, M.R.A.ANSARI
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – Appellant
Versus
P. N. BEHL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.N.KIRPAL, B.Kirpal, G.C.Sharma, V.Kumar

HARDAYAL HARDY, J.

( 1 ) IN this reference under section 66 (1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 (hereinafter REFERRED TO to as the act ) the following two questions of law have been REFERRED TO to this court by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (Delhi Bench a New Delhi) :

(1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the expenditure of Rs. 5,282. 00 incurred by the assessee in connection with his foreign tour was a revenue expenditure entitled to deduction in computing his professional income ? (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case. the Tribunal was right in holding that the sum of Rs. 3. 000. 00 received by the assessee was receipt of a casual and non-recourring nature exempt from tax u/s. 4 (3) (vii) of the Indian Income-tax Act 1922?the respondent, who will herein-after be REFERRED TO to as asscssee is a medical practitioner and is a specalist in the treatment of skin diseases. The assessment year is 1958-59, the relevant previous year being the financial year, ending on 31st March, 1958.

( 2 ) DURING the previous year, the assessee went from New Delhi to. Stockholm to attend the International Congress of Dermatology as an officia
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top