SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Del) 139

H.R.KHANNA, P.N.KHANNA
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – Appellant
Versus
MEATTELS LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.N.KIRPAL, N.D.KARKHAMI, Y.Dayal

P. N. KHANNA, J.

( 1 ) THE following question of law along with the statement of the case was referred to this Court under Section 66 (1) of the Indian Income Tax Act 1922, herein called the Act, by the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal Delhi Bench B, at the instance of the Commissioner of income Tax, Delhi, Central and Rajasthan, Delhi

"whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the assessee company was entitled to the deductions of the loss of Rs. 3,58,/83. 00 under section 10 (2) (vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1922. The Division Bench, when this matter first came up for hearing, before it, referred the question, in circumstances mentioned hereinafter. The referred question reads as follows: "whether on the facts and the circumstances of the case, the assessee-company nad sold the Crown Flour Mills to Hindustan Cold Stores and Refrigeration Limited within the meaning of Section 10 (2) (vii) of the Income-tax Act 1922, and entitled to the deductions of the loss of Rs. 3,58,783. 00under that Section?"

( 2 ) THE matter relates to the assessment year 1957-58, the relevent accounting year ending on September, 30, 1957. The assessee-company, Meattels Private Limited had been car






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top