SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Del) 132

S.N.SHANKAR
BISHAN DASS – Appellant
Versus
RAMESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K.MATHUR, S.C.Dhanda

S. N. SHANKAR

( 1 ) THE short question involved in this petition is as to the meaning and scope of section 7 of the Limitation Act, 1563, with reference to the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939.

( 2 ) ON September 12, 1965, at about 5. 45 P. M. one Mr. Dalpat Singh, while travelling in a passenger bus, fell down and was run over under the rear wheel of the bus due to the alleged negligence on the part of the driver of the bus. The deceased left two minor sons Ramesh and Banchhu aged 8 years and 5 years respectively and a widow. On April 22, 1966, the two minor sons filed an application under section 110- A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, against Bishan Dass driver of the bus and Messrs Safety Bus Service (P) Ltd. Sub-section (3) of section 110-A provided that no application for compensation under this section shall be entertained unless it was made within sixty days of the occurrence of the accident with proviso that the Claims Tribunal may entertain it if it is satisfied that the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause from making the application within time. In answer to the claim, the respondents contended that it was barred by time.










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top