SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Del) 176

HARDAYAL HARDY, PRITHVI RAJ
R. N. GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.Chawla, B.R.DEVAN, G.C.Sharma, V.Kumar

HARDAYAL HARDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS case relates to several years of assessment. It also relates to two brothers namely Shri R. N. Gupta and Shri Krishan Mohan who will hereafter be called "assessees". Several applications for referring the questions of law arising out of the judgments of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Delhi Bench "a") were filed by the assessees.

( 2 ) IN the case of Shri R. N. Gupta the relevanyears of assessment are 1959-60, 1960-61 and 1961-62, the accounting periods being the calendar years 1957, 1958, 1959, 1960 and 1961 respectively. Some of the reference applications which were filed before the Tribunal arose under Section 66 (1) of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 while others arose under Section 254 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Since the facts involved in the appeals of both the assessees were similar and the same questions of law arose out of the orders of the Tribunal, a common statement of case was drawn up by the Tribunal and referred, originally to the High Court of Judicature at Chandigarh. After the coming into force of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966, the statement of case is now before us. The questions of law are as follows :-

" (1) Whether on facts
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top