SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Del) 177

V.D.MISRA
BANI DEVI – Appellant
Versus
A. K. BANERJEE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.N.TOPA, R.M.LAL

V. D. MISRA, J.

( 1 ) THE main question which arises for decision in this appeal by the wife under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter REFERRED TO to as the Act) is as to what is meant by the expression incurably of unsound mind used in Section 13 (l) (iii) of the Act?

( 2 ) THE Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 does not define the term unsound mind. I find that while laying down the conditions for a Hindu marriage under Section 5 (ii) of the Act the Parliament used words idiot or lunatic for disqualifying a party from entering into a valid marriage. Under Section 10 (l) (. e) the term unsound mind has been used for giving a right to a party to pray for a decree of judicial separation. Under Section 13 (l) (iii) of the Act a party is entitled to ask for dissolution of a marriage by a decree of divorce on the ground that the other party has been incurably of unsound mind for a continuous period of not less than three years immediately preceding the presentation of the petition. The use of different expression in the same Act by the Parliament shows that they are not meant to convey the same meaning.

( 3 ) UNDER Section 12 (l) (b) of the Act, a marriage may be annuled by a de


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top