SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Del) 205

S.RANGARAJAN
KARNIDAN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.L.SANGHI, JANENDRA LAL, K.N.Kataria, R.M.MEHTA

S. Rangarajan, J.

( 1 ) THE main question for decision in this civil writ petition is whether the issue of notice dated 2nd March 1970 to the petitioner by the Director of Enforcement, Enforcement Directorate, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi, to show cause why adjudication proceedings as contemplated by section 23-D of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act VII of 1947 should not be taken against him, after Indian currency notes of the value of Rs. 50,000 were seized from his person as a result of his search under section 19a of the said Act on 3rd March 1969, is a "proceeding" within the meaning of section 19g of the said Act entitling the Director of Enforcement to retain the said currency notes until the disposal of the said proceeding. According to clause (7) of section 19a the expression "documeknt", employed in section 19a as well as sections 19c to 19g of the Act, includes Indian currency, foreign exchange and books of account.

( 2 ) THIS civil writ petition was filed on the supposition that no notice had in fact been issued wn the period of one year from the date of the said search; but this question has been set at rest, against the petitioner, by the production of not only th


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top