SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Del) 234

HARDAYAL HARDY, PRITHVI RAJ
MOHINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.L.Arora, S.N.CHAUDHARY

HARDAYAL HARDY; J.

( 1 ) ON 8-9-1968, in a small village called Poothkhurd within the jurisdiction of police station Narela in Delhi State a young man named Daya Nand who was employed as a teacher was murdered near about 11. 30 A. M. Two persons named Mohinder Singh S/o Sultan Singh, aged about 21 years and Umed Singh S/o Dhani Ram, aged about 26 years who were cousins of the deceased were sent up for trial for an offence u/s 302 read with Section 34 I. P. C. and were sentenced to imprisonment for life by Shri D. R. Khanna. Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi.

( 2 ) MOHINDER Singh has come up in appeal against his conviction and sentence and is appellant in criminal appeal No. 4 of 1971. Umed Singh who was also a school teacher is appellant in criminal appeal No. 7 of 1971. Both these appeals have been heard together as they arise out of a common incident and the appellants have been tried and convicted by the same judgment. Mohinder Singh is represented by Shri S. N. Chowdhry while Urned Singh is represented by Shri A. N. Mulla with Shri D. R. Kalia. Separate arguments have been addressed on behalf of both the appellants although the main argument was addressed by Shri A. N. Mulla, c













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top