High Court Of Delhi
O.N.TALWAR - Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR OF STAMPS - Respondent
Stamp Duty Reference 1 of 1968
Decided On : 09/13/1971
STAMP DUTY - Partition Deed - Valuation of Separated Share - Deduction of Liabilities - Hindu Law Obligations - Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Section 6.
Fact of the Case:
A partition deed was executed between Shri O. N. Talwar, petitioner, on his own behalf and as natural guardian of his minor sons, Shri Rai Talwar and Shri Ranjiv Talwar of the first part and Shrimati Kanta Talwar wife of Shri O. N. Talwar of the second part on 26.7.1966. The total assets were shown as Rs. 7,68,239-64, with liabilities of Rs. 4,07,115-09, resulting in a net divisible asset of Rs. 3,61,124-55. The stamp duty was paid on the basis of the net assets, but the Sub-registrar found that the stamp duty should have been paid on the gross assets, resulting in a deficiency of Rs. 1,931.00. The matter was referred to the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Delhi, under Section 57 (1) of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, for a determination of the correct stamp duty.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the value of the separated share or shares of the property means the market value at the time of partition, which is liable to be reduced if there are encumbrances or liabilities charged on the property. The value to be calculated for the purpose of stamp duty is the market value minus the encumbrances or liabilities. The court further held that the expenses for the marriage of the unmarried daughter are a legal liability of the joint family property and the market value of the property has to be calculated by deducting the amount of the said liability.
Issues: 1. Whether it is permissible to deduct from the value of gross assets the value of the expenses on obligations of the family under the Hindu Law, such as maintenance, education, and marriage of unmarried daughters, when the amounts on these future expenses have not been specifically mentioned in the deed, and then calculate stamp duty on the value of the separated share of net assets under Article 45 of Schedule I-A of the Indian Stamp Act? 2. Whether the obligation of the joint family property under the Hindu Law for expenses such as maintenance, education, and marriage of unmarried daughters is a valid liability and should be deducted from the market value of the property?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court interpreted Section 27 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, which requires the consideration and all other facts and circumstances affecting the chargeability of any instrument with duty to be fully and truly set forth therein, and held that the mere omission to state all the facts does not entail the consequence that a person is debarred from showing that there are liabilities which will reduce the total value of the property for the purpose of stamp duty. 2. The court relied on case law to establish that the right of an unmarried daughter to maintenance and marriage expenses out of Hindu Joint family property is in lieu of a share on partition and that this obligation is not affected by a partition between the father and his sons.
Final Decision: The court answered the reference question in the affirmative, holding that it is permissible to deduct from the value of gross assets the value of the expenses on obligations of the family under the Hindu Law, such as maintenance, education, and marriage of unmarried daughters, when the amounts on these future expenses have not been specifically mentioned in the deed, and then calculate stamp duty on the value of the separated share of net assets under Article 45 of Schedule I-A of the Indian Stamp Act.
( 1 ) THIS is a reference under Section 57 ( 1) of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (hereinafter to be called the Act) made by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Delhi.
( 2 ) A partition deed was executed between Shri O. N. Talwar, petitioner. on his own behalf and as natural guardian of his minor sons, Shri Ra\i Talwar and Shri Ranjiv Talwar of the first part and Shrimati Kanta Talwar wife of Shri O. N. Talwar of the second part on 26. 7. 1966. With this partition deed was attached a schedule to form part of the deed in which total assets were shown as Rs. 7,68. 239-64. The amount of respective liabilities to he discharged by the erstwhile members of the family were shown as Rs. 4,07,115-09 leaving a net divisible asset of Rs. 3,61,124-55. The same was divided amongst the lour members in equal shares of Rs. 90,281-14. In the body of the deed it was stated that whereas it was obligatory on the Hindu Undivided Family to make adequate provision for maintenance, education and p the celebration of the wedding of Kumari Rita Talwar before partition was effected and further whereas it was also obligatory to make provision to discharge other liabilities and whereas a net asset divisible amongst the parties to this deed stood reduced to Rs. 3,61 124-55 after providing for the discharge of all family liabilities, the value of the share of each of the parties to this deed is Rs. 90. 281 -14. It was also stated that Shrimati Kanta Talwar as a part of her obligation is responsible for meeting all expenditure on maintenance, education and wedding of Kumari Rita Talwar. The said partition deed was presented for registration bearing the stamp of Rs. 2,709. 00. The Sub-registrar. Delhi, before whom it was presented, found that the stamp duty has been paid on the basis of net assets of Rs. 3,61,124-55 calculated after deducting Rs. 4. 07,115-09 being the amount of liabilities to be discharged by the different members, though the total value of the assets partitioned is Rs. 7. 68,239-64 which should bear the stamp of Rs. 4. 640. 00. According to him the stamp was deficient by Rs. 1,93 I. 00 and he, therefore impounded the deed by his order dated 27. 9. 1966 and sent it to the Collector for necessary action under Section 40 of the Act. The Collector of Stamps by his order dated 12. 10. 1966 issued notice to the petitioner requiring him to show cause, why he be not required to make payment of the deficiency and the penalty in accordance with Section 40 of the Act. Cause was shown by the petitioner vide his reply dated 24th October, 1966, and also on oral hearing before the Collector. The Collector, however, by his order dated 17. 11. 1966 found that the question whether the stamp duty has to be calculated on the future net assets or the present (gross) assets is not free from doubt and therefore he referred the matter to the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Delhi, under Section 56 (2) of the Act to enable the stamp duty to be calculated. The reference under Section 56 (2) was heard by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority who was of the view that this was an important case involving a question of interpretation of law and is likely to effect in future such cases, he considered it necessary to have doubts on this question resolved by a reference to the High Court under Section 57 (1) of the Act. He, therefore, submitted the following question for reference to this court :-
"in a case of a deed of partition of the property of a Hindu Undivided Family, is it permissible to deduct from the value of gross assets the value of the expenses on obligations of the family under the Hindu Law e. g; maintenance, education and marriage of un-married daughter etc. when the amounts on these future expenses have not been specifically mentioned in the deed and share then calculate stamp duty on the value of the separated share of net assets under Article 45 of Schedule I-A of the Indian Stamp Act. "
( 3 ) THIS is how the matter has been pla
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.