HARDAYAL HARDY, S.N.SHANKAR, V.S.DESHPANDE
DHOOMI MAL RAM CHAND – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR OF STAMPS – Respondent
( 1 ) IN this reference under section 57 (2} at the Indian Stamp Act, we have to consider the true nature of the mortgage deed dated 24-6-1968 to opine whether :-
(1) it is a mortage deed by which "possesion of the property or any part of the property comprised m such deed is given by the mortgagor or agreed to be given" in the meaning of Article 40 (a) of Schedule I-A (Delhi) of the Stamp Act;
AND (2) the duty on transfer of property leviable under section 147 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 in the form of a surcharge on stamp duty can, be recovered as deficiency along with penalty under section 40 of the Stamp Act.
( 2 ) QUESTION NO. 1 :-
IT is common ground that the deed in question is a "mortgage deed" within the meaning of section 2 (17) of the Stamp Act. The question is whether it is a mortgage with possession or a simple mortgage. The distinction between these two types of mortgage has to be gathered from the provisions of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, section 58 (b), of which defines a simple mortgage and section 58 (d) of which defines a usufructuary mortgage. In a simple mortgage. the mortgagor does not deliver possession of the mortgag
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.