SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Del) 353

HARDAYAL HARDY, S.N.SHANKAR, V.S.DESHPANDE
DAYAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR OF STAMPS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.B.Kishore, G.L.SANGHI, J.P.Gupta, R.K.Mehra, S.Padmanabhan

v. S. Deshpande, J.

( 1 ) SHRI Satya Pal Behal held certain land on perpetual lease from the Delhi Development Authority. The lessee could not transfer the lease except with the previous consent in writing of the lessor. In granting such consent, the lessor could impose terms and conditions and was to be entitled to claim and recover 75 per cent of the "unearned increase in the value", i. e. , the difference between the premium paid and the market value, of the land at the time of the transfer from the existing lessee to the new lessee. This amount was to be a first charge on the land. Satya Pal Behal transferred the lease to Dayal Singh on 23-8-1969. The Delhi Development Authority granted permission to the transfer "subject to a deposit of Rs. 52,401. 95 as non-earned increase and further Rs. 271. 85 as non-construction penalty which the vendee has agreed to pay after the completion of the lease deed". The transfer deed further says that "the vendor hereby sells, transfers, conveys all his lease-hold rights" in consideration of a sum of Rs. 29,700 paid to the vendor on 29-7-1961 by the vendee.

( 2 ) THE question referred to us for opinion under section 57 (2) of the Indian Stamp






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top